We know from using the Newton-Leibniz theorem that the area under the curve of a function
with primitive
taken from
to
is given by:
![]()
The reality is that we need to adapt this depending on the function. This formula represents the net area between the curve of a function
Motivation
Say we want to find the total area enclosed between the graph of
and the
-axis from
to
.

If we blindly compute the definite integral across the entire interval using the Newton-Leibniz formula, we get:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} \sin(x) \, dx = \Big[ -\cos(x) \Big]_{-\pi}^{\pi} = \underbrace{-\cos(\pi)}_{1} - \underbrace{\big(-\cos(-\pi)\big)}_{1} = 1 - 1 = 0\]](https://mathematics.lu/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-b6900e7427d01318cb3d41f3b89a32b7_l3.png)
However, the total physical area cannot be zero because we see two regions and area is always non-negative.
How do we fix this? The problem comes from our function changing sign within the given interval. Therefore, if we put our function in absolute value, that will fix our problem. However, this is only helpful when we have a calculator to find the integral. We should still learn how to do this without relying on a calculator.
Total Area
To fix our opening problem, we follow the steps below:
- Separate the integral into appropriate intervals: Identify where the function changes signs by finding its roots (
-intercepts). - Set up the area formula with a minus sign for negative regions: To prevent cancellation, we place a minus sign in front of every integral for which the function is below the
-axis in that interval of integration. - Evaluate each integral separately via Newton-Leibniz.
- Add the results.
Example: Find the total area enclosed between the graph of
and the
-axis from
to
.

The definite integral tracks signed area. On the interval
, the function dips below the
-axis, yielding a negative integral value (
). On
, the function stays above the axis, yielding an equal positive value (
). When integrated as a single piece, these regions cancel each other out (
).
Example: Below is the graph of
. Find the total geometric area enclosed between
and the
-axis from
to
.

We can either find
and
as areas (and so they cannot be negative) and simply say
![]()
Or find
We may not always be given the graph of the function, so it may be up to use to understand if it is above the
Area Between Curves
If we are given two functions
and
and asked for the area between them, it is implied that these functions will intersect. To find the area between the two functions, we could find the area below the graph of a function, the area below the other, and subtract them. However, an easier approach would be to take the difference of functions. This will be a new function and the area between this new function and the
-axis is equivalent to the area between the functions.
The only problem with this is that we need to account for where the new function is positive/negative. This is the same as understand which function
or
is the greater one.
Example: Find the total geometric area enclosed between the cubic polynomial
and the linear function
.
To see where the curves cross and which function sits on top over different intervals, let us inspect the graph below:

Solid of Revolution
This formula is used to calculate the three-dimensional space (volume) inside a solid object that has a perfectly circular cross-section, like a vase, a funnel, a bowl, or a cone. In calculus, these shapes are called solids of revolution. Imagine you have a flat, 2D shape drawn on a piece of paper. The top boundary of this shape is your curve
, the bottom boundary is the straight line of the
-axis, and the sides are blocked off from
to
.
Now, imagine sticking a straight metal skewer directly along the
-axis and spinning the paper at a full 360-degree rotation. As that flat 2D shape sweeps through the air while spinning, it carves out a solid, 3D object in space. The straight line along the
-axis stays completely still, forming the solid core centre of the object.
The curve
spins through the air, forming the smooth outer crust/shell of the object.
Theorem (Volume of a Solid of Revolution – Disk Method): Let
be a continuous and non-negative function on the closed interval
. When the region enclosed under the curve
and the
-axis is rotated
around the
-axis, the volume
of the resulting three-dimensional solid is given by:
![]()
For background: This formula treats the solid as a collection of infinitely thin cylindrical disks with radius
and thickness
, where the area of each circular cross-section is
. Let us see this used in an example.
Example: Find the volume of the solid generated by revolving the region bounded by the curve
, the
-axis,
, and
around the
-axis.
Famous Volume Formula
In this section, we will use our knowledge of integrals and volumes to prove the formula for the volume of a sphere (as seen in S5).
Example: Prove the classical geometric formula for the volume of a sphere using the calculus disk method by revolving the upper semicircle
from
to
around the
-axis.
To help visualize how a 2D boundary curve spins to construct a perfect 3D sphere, let us look at the upper semicircle function graph below:

Gabriel’s Horn/Torricelli’s Trumpet
We finish our exploration into volume calculation with a famous example. Torricelli’s Trumpet is a famous mathematical paradox. It describes an infinitely long geometric solid that has a finite volume but an infinite surface area.
Evaluate the volume and surface area of Torricelli’s Trumpet (Gabriel’s Horn), generated by rotating the curve
from
to
around the
-axis.
2D Cross-Section Profile
3D Solid Revolution
Part 1: Volume Calculation
The general formula for the volume of a solid of revolution is
. Setting the boundaries from
to
yields:
![]()
Applying the power rule for integration:
![]()
Evaluating the limit as
reveals a finite volume:
![]()
Part 2: Surface Area Calculation
The general formula for the surface area (not in the programme) of a solid of revolution around the
-axis is:
![]()
For
, the derivative is
. Setting up the surface area integral gives:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[S = 2\pi \int_1^\infty \frac{1}{x} \sqrt{1 + \left(-\frac{1}{x^2}\right)^2} \, dx = 2\pi \int_1^\infty \frac{1}{x} \sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{x^4}} \, dx\]](https://mathematics.lu/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-0b02764352202b8ae2103503e91ae83c_l3.png)
Because the square root term
is strictly greater than
for all
, we can establish a lower-bound inequality:
![]()
Evaluating this integral over the infinite interval via natural logarithms:
![]()
Since the lower bound diverges to infinity, the total surface area
is infinite:
![]()
This implies you could fill the entire horn with a finite amount of paint, but that same amount of paint would not be enough to coat its outer surface!
Exercises
Find the exact geometric area enclosed between the graph of each function and the
-axis over the given interval. Use the provided vector plots for reference.
1.
from
to
.
2.
from
to
.
3.
from
to
.
4.
from
to
.
5.
from
to
.
Find the area enclosed between the curves of the given functions. Determine their intersection points algebraically to find the limits of integration.
1. Enclosed by
and
.

2. Enclosed by
and
.

3. Enclosed by
and
.

4. Enclosed by
and
.

Calculate the volume of the solid generated by rotating the region bounded by the given curves around the
-axis over the specified intervals.
1.
, the
-axis, from
to
.

2.
, the
-axis, from
to
.

3.
, the
-axis, from
to
.

4.
, the
-axis, from
to
.

Prove the classical geometric volume formula for a cone,
, using the disk integration method.
Consider a straight line starting at the point
on the
-axis and slanting down to hit the
-axis at the point
. When the area beneath this linear profile line is spun
around the
-axis, it carves out a perfect cone with base radius
and height
. Refer to the graph below:

Steps to Complete the Proof:
- Find the equation of the line as a function of
and
. - Use the formula for the solid of revolution volume with boundaries:
and
. - Apply the Newton-Leibniz formula.
Prove the classical geometric volume formula for a cylinder,
, by applying the volume formula to the constant function
from
to
.
